The right of objectors to appeal to VCAT for review of Council decisions to grant planning permits (pursuant to s.82 of the Planning and Environment Act 1987) is an important and well-established part of the Victorian planning regime.
However, for permit applicants, the cost and delays associated with objector appeals can be significant. And it can sometimes feel like these proceedings are devoid of planning merit and do not warrant wasting the permit applicant’s, Council’s or the Tribunal’s time.
In a recent VCAT appeal, Axicom Pty Ltd v Melton CC (Red Dot) [2020] VCAT 190, the Tribunal provided some interesting commentary on its powers to summarily dismiss/strike out appeals that are considered devoid of merit.
Section 75 of the VCAT Act provides that:
At any time, the Tribunal may make an order summarily dismissing or striking out all, or any part, of a proceeding that, in its opinion—
- is frivolous, vexatious, misconceived or lacking in substance; or
- is otherwise an abuse of process.
Generally, for an application for dismissal to be successful, it must show that a proceeding is obviously without merit and unequivocally bound to fail. However, due to the wide discretionary merits-based assessment required in planning matters, this test constitutes a very high bar and results in very few cases being dismissed at these early stages.
In the above case, Axicom appealed Council’s decision to grant a permit for the use and development of land for the purposes of a telecommunications antenna/pole. The Tribunal found that the appeal was “misconceived or lacking in substance, because it is devoid of planning merit having regard to the grounds of review” and summarily dismissed it.
In coming to that conclusion, the Tribunal’s Deputy President stated:
- The power in section 75(1) of the VCAT Act is predicated on the ‘opinion’ of the tribunal that a proceeding is misconceived or lacking in substance…
- In forming the requisite opinion, the Planning and Environment List at VCAT is uniquely constituted as an expert tribunal, with experienced members well able to determine the occasional matter that is devoid of planning merit and bound to fail.
- Moreover, in an era where courts and tribunals are concerned with limited resources and efficient case management, it is appropriate that proceedings that are objectively devoid of planning merit are quickly disposed of – albeit cautiously (…) There is a public interest in avoiding lengthy hearings for matters that have no prospect of success.
Although, far from opening the floodgates for summary dismissal of objector appeals, these comments do provide some hope for permit applicants who find their approvals being challenged at VCAT on vexatious or hopeless grounds.
Seek Professional Advice Information contained in this publication should be considered as a reference only and is not a substitute for professional advice. No liability will be accepted for any loss incurred as a result of relying on the information contained in this publication. Seek professional advice in specific circumstances. Copyright If you would like to reproduce or use for your own purposes any part of this publication please contact enquiries@clause1.com.au for assistance. Clause1 Pty Ltd Phone: 03 9370 9599 Email: enquiries@clause1.com.au Web: www.clause1.com.au
——————————————————————————————————————————————————